Showing posts with label allan loeb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label allan loeb. Show all posts

Monday, May 07, 2007

Script Review: Brian Singer's Next, Valkyrie

Simon Reynolds has completed another of his brilliant script reviews. This time he's only gone and made me jealous by reading Valkyrie, the script for the next film to be directed by Brian Singer. Christopher McQuarrie is, without a doubt, one of my favourite screenwriters, so this really has me excited. Over to Simon...

A look at Tom Cruise’s slate of upcoming films makes for interesting reading. There’s ensemble drama Lions For Lambs; Men, an Allan Loeb comedy; a possible Spike Lee joint; a surely ill-advised Hardy Boys remake with Ben Stiller (though the pair were hilarious in that MTV M:I spoof.); and Valkyrie, a Bryan Singer directed period thriller scripted by Christopher McQuarrie and Nathan Alexander. Cruise is certainly making some diverse choices.

In Valkyrie, he’ll will play Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, a German officer who becomes integral in a plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler and stage a coup to establish a new German government towards the tail-end of World War II. The story is based on real events, one of the numerous attempts to end Hitler’s life.

An Internet search for “Operation Valkyrie” will reveal much of the film’s plot and the main players for both Hitler and the Stauffenberg ledresistance. Consequently there’s not much point in going into great analysis of the plot since it’s already out there – but most of you will want to know exactly what “Valkyrie” is. So here’s a quick summary: Operation Valkyrie refers to the mobilisation of the German Reserve Army in the event of a national emergency. It’s main purpose was to crush any insurgency in the event of Hitler’s death. Stauffenberg, Ludwig Beck (Former Army Chief of Staff), Friedrich Oldbricht (Chief of Berlin Army Office), Carl Goerdeler (former Mayor of Leipzig) and Erwin Von Witzleben (ex-field marshal of the Military District) lead the resistance and hatch a plan to kill the Fuhrer and take Berlin using Reserve Army. They’ll then quickly establish a new government led by Beck in the hope of calling a truce with the Allies and stop Germany being bombed into oblivion.

With Russia pressing forward from the east and the Allies invading Normandy, Germany is desperate. Yet the delusional Hitler won’t budge, and his terrified inner circle won’t tell him their army is taking a battering. When Stauffenberg is promoted it gives him the perfect opportunity to get close to his target.

McQuarrie and Alexander start Valkyrie slowly in the first act as so many characters need to be introduced that it becomes very easy to get lost. Though it’s being pitched as an ensemble movie, it really belongs to Cruise’s character. Stauffenberg is introduced in North Africa where he becomes horrendously disfigured. Don’t expect the matinee idol Tom Cruise, his character has facial scars, loses an eye (though he occasionally sports a cloudy glass one), and ends up without his right hand and only three fingers on the left!

Whereas McQuarrie juggled several characters in The Usual Suspects, here we get a lot of characters who drop in and out to support Stauffenberg –most of them are a little too thinly sketched.

You’d expect Hitler to be the main villain of this story, but he’s not, McQuarrie and Alexander keep him concealed and at arm’s length for most of the script. General Freidrich Fromm is the character who generates the most contempt.

As a whole, Valkyrie is well constructed – each scene moves the plot hurtling forward to it’s inevitable conclusion and . It does an excellent job of building tension, particularly in the scene where Stauffenberg constructs briefcase bomb and slides it next to Hitler and as the coup begins to take shape towards the end.

It’ll be interesting to see how Singer casts the rest of Valkyrie. Will he support Cruise with high profile stars or perhaps cast lesser known European actors? The role of Beck is brief but would be a great part for an older, distinguished actor. Beck is a gravely ill man looking for redemption, to do one thing that’ll make amends for being a servant to the Nazis. Sean Connery would be great, not only would he be able to unleash his patented “Scottish will do for any accent” accent but if he is indeed retiring it’d be nice to see him go out on something, anything but The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. Failing that, Singer could reunite with Frank Langella or Sir Ian McKellan.

Valkyrie could well re-energising the careers of the key creative players. Cruise has a meaty, challenging role he can get to grips (and possibly a run at an Oscar) and McQuarrie is at last getting a project out of development hell.

Also, after ten years playing in the studio toy box, Singer is finally making a “real” movie. For a director who exploded onto the scene with so much promise, it’s been slightly disappointing that he’s been exclusively making superhero films recently.

I have no problems with the genre, in fact I love a good superhero film. After Superman Returns, however, it’s a good move for him to veer away from that franchise. Singer is an excellent director but he comes across as too much of a cynic. That’s ideal for X-Men but not the bright and sunny Superman. He’s miscast as the Man of Steel’s director, as was Richard Lester. Can anyone honestly say that Lester is a worse director than Richard Donner? Yet the latter seemed to have a better grasp of Superman and his world.

Valkyrie, though, is right up Singer’s street and it could very well be his best film since The Usual Suspects. The script clocks in at less than 120 pages, which is rare at this point in time. Many films seem to be bloated and go way over 2 hours when there isn’t a need to. The script tells a fascinating story and it does so with intelligence, style, edge-of-your-seat-suspense and a close eye on the history books.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Script Review: The Only Living Boy In New York

Here's another script review from Simon, this time for The Only Living Boy in New York, written by Allan Loeb. If King of Kong director Seth Gordon is all I want him to be, this could turn out to be one of the best films of 2008. I've got a different kind of piece on this script coming soon, too - but be sure to read Simon's take now. This is a great review, and it's going to leave you very, very keen to see the film.

Many films get tagged as a “modern-day Graduate”. Last to stake a claim was Zack Braff’s Garden State – an emo coming of age story for Generation Y. Allan Loeb’s The Only Living Boy In New York will be the next major film to get lumped in with The Graduate. Of course, by lifting its title from a Simon & Garfunkel song (one that also turned up in Garden State), Loeb is obviously aware of the similarities.

Loeb toiled for years in Hollywood trying to launch his writing career. Frustrated and broke, he wrote The Only Living Boy In New York thinking it would be his last. Two years on and he’s hot property. The Only Living Boy In New York is set up at Columbia with the promising Seth Gordon attached to direct.

Along with this project, he is also behind Susanne Bier’s upcoming Things We Lost in the Fire and the big-screen version of Ben Mezrich’s thrilling card-counters-take-Vegas book, Bringing Down the House. How quickly things change.

The Only Living Boy In New York tells the story of a recent graduate, Thomas Webb, who finds himself adrift and directionless in New York. Thomas wants to be a writer, but his father Nathan, a hotshot publisher, thinks Thomas’ attempt at a book isn’t up to scratch. Thomas is also unrequitedly in love with Mimi, a girl he met in a bookstore but can’t get break through the “just friends” zone. The rest of the Webbs aren’t particularly stable either, mother Judith is in melt-down and Nathan is off gallivanting with the sexy Johnanna. Thomas’ discovery of his father’s affair sparks the story into motion and he soon becomes involved with Nathan’s ice-cool blonde mistress.

W.F. Gerald, Thomas’ neighbour and a renowned novelist, befriends him and becomes a mentor of sorts, he also uses him as inspiration, with Thomas becoming the main character in his new book.

Allan Loeb has written a story that is honest, sincere and despite being set in the world of NY intelligentsia, never alienates or becomes pompous. It deals with the human condition, what is it to love and be loved, growing up, defining ourselves… things that tap into our own experiences.

Perhaps that is what made The Graduate tick? A generation of people in early adulthood in the 60s all saw something recognisable in Benjamin Braddock. With a strong cast, and if Seth Gordon delivers on his potential, this film could be something special.

Loeb’s writing style is economical but not slight, he manages to convey a lot by writing very little. His words flow beautifully and time flies when reading his scripts, had he not been a screenwriter he might have made an excellent novelist. His sharp rise to the Hollywood A-list has drawn comparisons with Charlie Kaufman and Zach Helm. But Loeb isn’t really like either, his writing ignores gimmickry and cuts straight to the heart of the matter.

The Only Living Boy In New York is a film primed for adoption by the MySpace generation, but don’t let that scare you away, it has warmth, wit, intelligence, and intriguing plot turns that pushes it to the very top of the coming of age genre.